Impact of anti-HDV reflex testing at HBs antigen positive discovery in a single center France: Support for primary HDV screening in France.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis Delta virus (HDV) infection is a major cause of liver-related morbidity and mortality in patients infected with HBV, with a global HDV prevalence uncertain. In France, 2 to 5 % of HBs antigen (HBsAg) carriers present anti-HDV antibodies (anti-HDV). The EASL recommends testing for anti-HDV in all HBsAg-positive patients. Since January 2022, we have systematically carried out anti-HDV serology when a positive HBsAg is discovered (new HBsAg carriers). OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the benefit of anti-HDV reflex testing after one year of practice by comparing anti-HDV and HBsAg serology data over the last six years, among the new HBsAg carriers and all the HBsAg carriers. STUDY DESIGN: HBsAg and anti-HDV were screened using the Abbott Architect HBsAg quanti kit and the DIA.PRO HDVAb kit. Serological, demographic, virological, and clinical data were analyzed. RESULTS: Implementing anti-HDV reflex testing leads to more than a 2-fold increase in diagnoses of HDV infection among all HBsAg carriers. If the anti-HDV positive rate remains stable among the new HBsAg carriers, a significant increase in the anti-HDV positive rate from 6.8 % to 10.3 % was observed considering all HBsAg carriers. Interestingly, the discovery of anti-HDV carriage increased from 3.9 % to 6.5 % in 2022, allowing earlier identification of HBV-HDV-infected patients and a fast referral to hepatologists for adequate clinical management and, in some cases, the introduction of bulevirtide-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary results at one year seem promising and evaluating the cost-effectiveness of reflex tests in real life with feedback would be helpful.

Changes in the profile and therapeutic care of people who use drugs with HCV mono-infection: a retrospective study between 2015 and 2019 from a monocentric tertiary referent center in France.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: People who use drugs (PWUDs) are the main group at risk for hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission and a key population for hepatitis C elimination. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings were set up in France in December 2014 within regional reference centers to supervise the prescriptions and delivery of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to optimize the management of HCV infection. The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze the changes in the profile and therapeutic care of PWUDs with HCV mono-infection according to the evolution of MDT meetings in a regional tertiary reference center. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2019, overall 1912 HCV-infected patients presented at the MDT meetings, 547 were PWUDs with HCV mono-infection treated with DAAs. Five periods were defined according to the evolution of MDT meetings. The profile and management of PWUDs were compared among these five periods. RESULTS: Over time, the frequency of advanced stage of fibrosis decreased from 90.8 to 36.3% (P < 0.001), whereas the therapeutic care of the patients in primary addictology centers and networks of general practitioners increased from 17.4 to 55% (P < 0.001). The frequency of excessive alcohol consumption varied between 9.1 and 30% (P = 0.003) and that of opioid substitution therapy between 42.5 and 70% (P < 0.001). The Sustained virologic response assessed 12 weeks after the end of treatment rate was above 95% for the five periods. CONCLUSION: Between 2015 and 2019, the changes in the profile and management of PWUDs have followed the evolution of MDT meetings concerning patients with less advanced fibrosis and more therapeutic hepatitis C care made by the primary care centers.

Abnormal liver tests and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease predict disease progression and outcome of patients with COVID-19.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a serious public health issue that became rapidly pandemic. Liver injury and comorbidities, including metabolic syndrome, are associated with severe forms of the disease. This study sought to investigate liver injury, clinical features, and risk factors in patients with mild, moderate, and severe COVID-19. METHODS: We retrospectively included all consecutive patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 between February, 22 and May 15, 2020 at the emergency rooms of a French tertiary hospital. Medical history, symptoms, biological and imaging data were collected. RESULTS: Among the 1381 hospitalizations for COVID-19, 719 patients underwent liver tests on admission and 496 (68.9%) patients displayed abnormal liver tests. Aspartate aminotransferase was most commonly abnormal in 57% of cases, followed by gamma-glutamyl transferase, alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, and total bilirubin in 56.5%, 35.9%, 18.4%, 11.4%, and 5.8%. The presence of hepatocellular type more than 2xULN was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization and a worse course of severe disease (odd ratio [OR] 5.599; 95%CI: 1.27-23.86; p = 0.021; OR 3.404; 95% CI: 2.12-5.47; p < 0.001, respectively). A higher NAFLD fibrosis score was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization (OR 1.754; 95%CI: 1.27-2.43, p < 0.001). In multivariate analyses, patients with high fibrosis-4 index had a 3-fold greater risk of severe disease (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Abnormal liver tests are common in patients with COVID-19 and could predict the outcome. Patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and liver fibrosis are at higher risk of progressing to severe COVID-19.

Characteristics and care of chronic hepatitis C treated with direct-acting antivirals in migrants.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatitis C is poorly documented in migrants. The published studies mainly concern the screening in this population and are limited to some countries in Europe and North America. This study aimed to evaluate the characteristics and care of chronic hepatitis C in this population compared to the nonmigrant population, in the era of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). METHOD: We performed a retrospective analysis based on data presented at the multidisciplinary team meetings of our tertiary care center between 2015 and 2019. RESULTS: We included 277 migrant- and 1390 nonmigrant patients mono-infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and treated with DAAs. The majority of the migrants were from Eastern European countries. In multivariable analysis, BMI classes associated with more obesity (OR = 1.84; 95% CI, 1.37-2.49; P < 0.001) and therapeutic patient education (OR = 3.91; 95% CI, 2.38-6.49; P < 0.001) were positively associated with migrant status, whereas age (OR = 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94; P < 0.001), female gender (OR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.28-0.74; P = 0.002), modes of contamination with less drug use, transfusion history or nosocomial risk, as well more unknown mode (OR = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50-0.96; P = 0.031), alcohol consumption (OR = 0.48; 95% CI, 0.29-0.73; P = 0.001), types of structures with less care in a general hospital or health network of general practitioners and more care in a university hospital or primary addictology center (OR = 0.78; 95% CI, 0.60-0.99; P = 0.046) and opioid substitution therapy (OR = 0.25; 95% CI, 0.08-0.68; P = 0.008) were negatively associated with migrant status. The substained virologic response 12 was close to 97% in both groups. CONCLUSION: Despite multiple differences in characteristics and therapeutic care between the two populations, the chances of healing hepatitis C were the same among migrant- compared with nonmigrant patients.